Please Let Me Know How Much You Like This (1 is very Bad - 10 is Excellent)

How the feathers work during wing flapping?

I wanted to make an animation of a wing flapping mechanism. While doing some research about these kinds of mechanisms, I stumbled upon the TreeSwallowProjects website. On the website they mention that the feathers on a wing were opening during the upward stroke of the wing to reduce drag. This may be a well known concept to some, but was new to me. The swallow picture you see here shows this phenomenon clearly and I want to thank Chris Gates for giving me the permission to use this image in this animation. Please take a good look at this image as it plays a very important role in the following explanation.

The wings on a bird are in fact a set of flaps which open when the wing rises and closes when the wing descends. This means there is less pressure on the wing during the upward stroke than in the downward stroke. The quill, or the shaft, of a feather does not always lie in the center, but is often well to one side with a row of feathers arranged so that they overlap and turn somewhat on their shaft. I wanted to make this animation to show the flap action of feathers. At first, I thought this would be an easy task. Since I had my wing flapping mechanism, as you see here, I thought the only change required was to add feathers on it, and show how the feathers were acting during the upward stroke.

Here is the animation of the wing flapping with flight feathers superimposed on it. I based my animation on the figures shown below from Lilienthal's book, Birdflight, page 101. As you can see flaps are opening on the upstroke to reduce the drag. The movement of the feather flapping is exaggerated to show you how the feathers operate.

But there is a slight problem here. If you really look at the photo of the swallow, you can clearly see the gaps between flight feathers. However when viewing the blue bird shown in this mechanism (below), you cannot see between the feathers.

Either I misinterpreted Lilienthal's drawing or he overlooked some subtle errors in the artist rendering of the condor wing arrangement. I did not see anything wrong with this arrangement before doing the animation, but the error manifested itself once I completed the animation.

Apparently, something was not right here. However, the feathers could also be arranged differently than what was shown in the fictitious blue bird here, and that is the case for all living birds which are represented with red bird animation here. Notice that now you can see in between the feathers.

All the living birds' feather flap mechanism works just like the red bird shown here. What is the difference between these two birds? There are two major differences.

The first difference is that the shaft of the feather, represented by green arcs, is always away from the bird's body for living red bird, and the opposite for the fictitious blue bird. The second difference is that, the tip flight feather of the red bird is always fully visible if we look under the bird, and the other feathers always overlap one another. For the blue bird, the feather closest the bird body is fully visible and the rest is overlapped. I call the red bird feather arrangement a positive arrangement and the blue birds a negative arrangement. Also if the shaft of the feather is away from the bird, it will be called a positive feather and will be shown as a red feather. The blue birds flight feather is such that, the shaft of the feather is always closer the bird body. These kinds of feathers will be called negative feathers. It will be clear soon why I use the term positive and negative for feathers and feather arrangements.

If the feathers were acting as a flap, then why don.t we see birds in nature that are like the blue bird? Since in both cases the flaps are opened in upstroke, there should be a 50/50 chance for both red and blue birds. However we do not see birds like the blue bird. Maybe it.s because all birds, by luck, descended from one type of bird and that is why we see only birds like red one in nature. This would be very simplistic explanation. Or maybe there is more in this than we imagined. As Lilienthal mentioned in his book, in nature any design is not an accidental one. If nature selects one design over the other, than there must be a solid reason for that.

Let,s start digging into this subtle difference and see why nature selected the red bird over the blue one. As you can see from these animations, when the feathers are opened in up stroke, the air is pushed toward under the bird.s body for the red bird, and away from the body for the blue bird. This is a vital difference, and here is why.

Think for a moment that the blue bird is on the ground, and a predator is approaching. The bird instinctively flaps its wings to take off. First it is pushing its wings downward, it is also pushing the air under its wing downward, and it gains slight altitude. But when the bird is in up stroke, the motion of the wing creates a vacuum under the wing. Since the air under the wing has an outward inertia, due to previous down stroke, does not have enough time to fill this gap. At the same time the air passing between the feathers going outward, blocking some of extra air coming toward under the wing; As a result the bird will be sucked downward. This will nullify all the altitude gain obtained during the wings down stroke and because it did not get enough air under the wing, the next down stroke will be weaker. The bird will frantically flap its wings, and with each down stroke it will go up slightly, and fall down with each up stroke. So birds that are like the blue bird could only fly if they were to jump from a branch off of a tree or from a cliff, taking off from the ground would be next to impossible for them.

Now let's consider the red bird. When the wings are coming down, whatever happened with the blue bird will be repeated for the red bird as well. However their up stroke is quite different from blue birds. While the wings are going up, the opening in the feather will push the air under the bird.s body with a force that, not only will it will super charge the void with the fresh air from above, it will also give some upward force to the bird.s body and keep it from falling downward. Also the air coming around and under the bird toward the void will be assisted by the air coming through the feathers above. I use the term super charge here, because this is exactly what it is, the power used during the upstroke by the bird is converted sending more air atoms downward. This has two effects. First, it gives an upward push to the bird much like a Harrier jet. Second, it accumulates air under the wing for next downward stroke. And the next downward stroke will take the bird higher. In short, for the red bird, there will be more air atoms to be pushed downward for each down stroke than the blue bird. Since it is supercharging air under its wing, the red bird will take off from ground very efficiently. Due to the supercharging effect we call the red bird.s feather arrangement a positive arrangement.

Feather arrangements also play a crucial role during cruising flight, as mentioned by Lilienthal, both birds, blue and red, will benefit from the opening of flaps because it will reduce the drag during the upstroke. Assuming that both birds are flying the same given speed during a cruising flight one may assume that there are no differences between the two birds. Both birds will get fresh air under their wings due to their forward speed. However, there is a slight difference between the airflow generated by the upstroke of the wings.

When the blue birds feathers open during the upstroke outward moving air pushes the tip of the feathers downward and tilts it in such a way that it creates an out and downward air movement. However, with the red bird this process will create a merging air flow as shown in the figure. This is very important event. As we know, when an object moves through the air with speed, it creates a low pressure region behind it, which causes drag that will reduce the speed of the moving object. Therefore the red bird.s air movement will try to fill the gap behind the bird, reducing the drag. Since the blue bird.s wings are pushing the air away from the body, it will not fill the gap behind it. This will cause considerable drag on the birdr's movement. Also, the blue bird is trying to push the air outward, into still air, which might show resistance to it, and cause the bird to use more force and energy to push the air. On the other hand, the red birds wings are pushing the air toward a cavity, which needs air, so that it can be filled. In short filling the void behind a flying bird will reduce the drag and as a result energy consumption of upward moving wings will be reduced.

The figure given above shows a converging air flow for the red bird and diverging one for the blue one. Is it a coincidence that these converging lines on the feather have the same direction and almost the same angle with the barbs on the feather? Is this a freak accident, or are barbs assisting the airflow to be pushed toward the cavity behind the bird? I have a small hunch that this is the case.

I thank Dr. Bret from the University of Montana, Division of Biological Sciences, for giving me permission to use the hummingbird picture in a wind tunnel shown above. As you see in this picture the feathers open in the upward stoke and the airflow converges toward the back of the hummingbird.

This figure shows four possible combinations of feather arrangements, positive feather arrangement, negative feather arrangement, positive feather arrangement and negative feather arrangement. Only the red bird has the capability of taking off of the ground and have efficient flight capability. The blue bird has the ability to glide but would fly inefficiently. The other combinations are not suitable for flight and or gliding.

As you can see, having two birds identical in their looks, but with very different feather arrangements leads to a different path in the evolution of birds. If in nature, there were birds like the blue bird we showed here today they could not compete with the red birds.

The red bird is a master piece of the nature, because nature threw everything in its arsenal to make perfect flying machine.

Recently I see following video where a Go Pro camera mounted at the tip of the beak of a pelican.
You can observe opening of the feathers in upstroke. I catch a couple of images from the video for you to see this feather bending phenomenon.

Peter Sharp
14 Nov 2013

noor
16 Jan 2014

C Bennett
31 Jan 2014

Excellent very educational . Would be interesting to see how bats achieves flight with a feather less wing--10 out 10

ME EN 437 Student
04 Mar 2014

Trevor
18 Apr 2014

I used you image as the model in which I built a Mechanism that replicates flapping flight. I would like to reference your webpage in my report to my professor. May I?

Abhishek
26 Apr 2014

Excellent

aotaijixie2010
21 May 2014

TeckFreak
09 Jul 2014

U R f-ing Awsome! I'm an inventor (for about 12 years now) and close to my 3000 constructions. Now I found this site and your anima

Amir
19 Jul 2014

VERY GOOOOOOOOOOOOOD

rohit digpaul
25 Aug 2014

SUPERB.....EXCELENT..... I WANT TO BUY THE MECHANISM... IWANT MAKE ONE.... WHOM TO CONTACT ...

Andres
01 Oct 2014

Thank you for such insight. If you have an email list please add me. I would love to get information about any further updates!

zak
09 Oct 2014

kumar
19 Oct 2014

Human can fly by using wings and not required any motor n fuel.
The design is in my mind but I don't know how to start experiment

SATISH J
30 Nov 2015

Excellent work!!
Thank you so much

Peter
20 Sep 2016

This is the best I found looking for details about

Darshana
10 Dec 2016

Excellent

sean
18 Jan 2017

good

Sabah
09 Feb 2017

This was a huge help for my graphic design bachelor project!

thankful!

Fatso
07 Apr 2017

this is awesome

Add a comment or brief description of this mechanism in your language.

LEGIT Comments will be displayed in 24 hours.

74 + 28 =